June Mabry has confirmed she is running for First Vice-Chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party. Mabry, 53, is challenging Stella Adams who is seeking re-election. Despite what has been described as a lackluster performance over the past two-years, Adams, 52, is desperate to hang onto her position on the state party's executive board.
These two candidates differ widely in their approach to serving the party, work ethic, effectiveness and, most importantly, getting results. For these reasons, NCDP Politics proudly endorses June Mabry for First Vice-Chair of the NCDP.
Find out what really goes on inside the North Carolina Democratic Party. We publish the latest news on everything from the Charlotte 2012 Democratic National Convention plans to who are the Movers, Shakers & Trouble-Makers" to Leadership Progress Reports on the issues plaguing the party.
All stories posted are fact-checked, accurate with links to documentary proof.
Read up on the NCDP's inner-workings and learn what's happening inside our party headquarters. Share this with all party officers and active democrats today! All articles posted are fact-checked for accuracy and provide corroborating links to documented evidence as proof. Contact us at ncdppolitics@gmail.com.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Part 1: Meek, Faison launch Smear Campaign on Parker for NCDP Chair
In his speech tonight at the Arizona memorial service for the Loughner shooting victims, President Barack Obama urged Americans to "not turn on one another" and to demand civil discourse return to politics, replacing heated debates that have digressed into smear campaigns and harsh rhetoric inside the political arena.
Here in North Carolina, few democrats expect Bill Faison and Jerry Meek will ever proactively return to civil discourse as President Obama urged. Case in point: Faison's statewide teleconference on Tuesday, January 11th. During that teleconference Faison who is running for Chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party launched into a blanket smear campaign disparaging his opponent, front-runner David Parker.
Here in North Carolina, few democrats expect Bill Faison and Jerry Meek will ever proactively return to civil discourse as President Obama urged. Case in point: Faison's statewide teleconference on Tuesday, January 11th. During that teleconference Faison who is running for Chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party launched into a blanket smear campaign disparaging his opponent, front-runner David Parker.
Meek, a former NCDP chair quickly recruited Faison upon learning of Parker's candidacy in December 2010. Meek has since taken a very active role in Faison's campaign and this blanket smear campaign has Meek's fingerprints all over it. Faison and Meek are collaborating to discredit Parker's record and influence the state party's 800-member executive committee to elect Faison instead. This is a prime example of the anti-social behavior that defines party in-fighting and is just another continuation of the uncivil political discourse President Obama spoke out against during Wednesday night's memorial service.
It took a little research to get the dirt on mudslinging, how it's done and why some people choose to do it. It's best defined as a....
Smear Campaign: (noun, idiom) An effort to damage or call into question somebody's reputation, by propounding negative propaganda.
Here's are the basic elements to creating your garden-variety smear campaign:
Who: A weaker candidate will use a smear campaign to distract and confuse voters about the opponent's reputation. Smears are considered to be a low, disingenuous and unethical form of discourse.
What: A smear is a simple attempt to undermine the opponent's credibility. A smear campaign is multiple attempts to ruin another's reputation. The #1 tactic is fabricating an alternative record for the opponent and filling it with distortions, half-truths or even outright lies, and unverifiable rumours, better known as baseless gossip.
How: In politics a "blanket smear campaign" takes multiple issues that don't really have any direct connection to each other and compiles them into talking points to blanket the opponent in negative statements. The goal is to get people to question the target's ethics, capabilities and accomplishments.
When the facts contradict the smears, the attacker will ignore them and shift gears to statements that cannot be easily refuted and referencing "witnesses" or people from the target's past to sound more credible and appear to be "common knowledge." When the target disputes this alternative record, the attacker will claim "where there's smoke, there's fire" to give the impression there must be some truth among the multiple smears.
Caveat: "Don't blink and don't blush." An attacker must stick to his guns when publicly busted for smearing his opponent. He will then need to rely on being nebulous and evasive when pushed to produce evidence or name names alluded to in the smears.
Caveat: "Don't blink and don't blush." An attacker must stick to his guns when publicly busted for smearing his opponent. He will then need to rely on being nebulous and evasive when pushed to produce evidence or name names alluded to in the smears.
When: The best timing for using smear tactics is whenever an opponent is presenting an effective argument, case or campaign. Trial lawyers know this tactic is extremely effective in undermining a witness's credibility.
Why: Political smear campaigns, mud slinging, whatever you want to call it, all boils down to deliberate attempts to malign another's reputation. The motives for engaging in smear tactics are usually personal, financial or revenge.
Most importantly, a smear campaign requires enlisting stupid people to support and perpetuate it. You know the type. People who enjoy besmirching others.
Most importantly, a smear campaign requires enlisting stupid people to support and perpetuate it. You know the type. People who enjoy besmirching others.
That brings us full-circle to Bill Faison, a trial attorney selling his soul (and integrity) to win the state party chair election on Saturday, January 29, 2011. Now that you know how a smear campaign works, we'll detail the differences between Parker and Faison and how they're conducting their campaigns.
Read Part 2's follow-up article here that reveals Faison's unfounded attacks and specific smears with links to irrefutable facts and evidence we located online and that anyone can veri-google. This fact-check article is a must read for anyone voting in the NCDP's January 29th party election in Raleigh.
Bookmark NCDPpolitics to find out the inside story of NCDP's back-room politics.
June Mabry running for NCDP office?
The field of candidates is growing in the election races for the North Carolina Democratic Party Executive Board. June Mabry, 53, is listed among the candidates attending the Mecklenburg County Democratic Party Candidates Forum and Meet & Greet in Charlotte on Saturday, January 22nd.
As of January 11th, Mabry is one of six candidates confirmed to attend the forum. Insiders are betting on Mabry to challenge Stella Adams for the First Vice Chair seat. The forum will run from 4 pm to 6pm at the Carole A. Hoefener Community Center (610 E. 7th Street) in Charlotte.
Mabry is the 8th congressional district chair and a resident of Albermarle. Check back here for confirmation and more details on Mabry's candidacy.
As of January 11th, Mabry is one of six candidates confirmed to attend the forum. Insiders are betting on Mabry to challenge Stella Adams for the First Vice Chair seat. The forum will run from 4 pm to 6pm at the Carole A. Hoefener Community Center (610 E. 7th Street) in Charlotte.
Mabry is the 8th congressional district chair and a resident of Albermarle. Check back here for confirmation and more details on Mabry's candidacy.
. ..........
First Vice Chair,
June Mabry,
NCDP,
party officer,
Stella Adams
Kevin Smith, Delmas Parker announce state party candidacy
Two candidates announced their intentions to run for officer positions in North Carolina Democratic Party yesterday, Tuesday, January 11, 2011. After reviewing their announcements and intentions, NCDPpolitics is endorsing only one of the two.
Kevin Smith, 34, made it official in announcing his bid for party Secretary on BlueNC.com, the progressive democrats blog, Tuesday. Delmas Parker, 73, also came forward seeking re-election as the party's Second Vice-Chair.
Smith's priority is to "move forward and build a strong Democratic Party(...) controlled by the people and not special interests," according to his announcement. Smith says his focus will be on the issues that are of greatest concern to the people, reconnecting with the people and rebuilding the party's future through several goals:
NCDPpolitics endorses Kevin A. Smith for state party secretary. Stay tuned for an upcoming article later today on Delmas Parker's candidacy.
Kevin Smith, 34, made it official in announcing his bid for party Secretary on BlueNC.com, the progressive democrats blog, Tuesday. Delmas Parker, 73, also came forward seeking re-election as the party's Second Vice-Chair.
Smith's priority is to "move forward and build a strong Democratic Party(...) controlled by the people and not special interests," according to his announcement. Smith says his focus will be on the issues that are of greatest concern to the people, reconnecting with the people and rebuilding the party's future through several goals:
- Information on Demand
- Streamlined Information Process
- Accurate and Expedient Distribution of Party Minutes
- Transparency of Party Activities
- Accurately archiving all Party documentation
NCDPpolitics endorses Kevin A. Smith for state party secretary. Stay tuned for an upcoming article later today on Delmas Parker's candidacy.
. ..........
candidacy,
delmas parker,
endorsement,
Kevin Smith,
second vice chair,
secretary
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Is Bill Faison telling the truth?
Bill Faison is banking on Governor Bev Perdue's endorsement in his run for Chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party. In fact, Faison alludes to Perdue backing him in that sly language some politicians use all too often -- saying it in so many words without actually saying it. The point being to get you to believe it.
On January 10, 2011, Bill Faison participated in a "live blog" between 9 and 10 pm on BlueNC.com to answer questions posted earlier by readers. One person specifically asked Faison "have you met with Governor Perdue regarding this (chair) position? If so, has she expressed her opinion about your candidacy?"
Faison's answer was incredibly unclear. Here's his response, verbatim:
On January 10, 2011, Bill Faison participated in a "live blog" between 9 and 10 pm on BlueNC.com to answer questions posted earlier by readers. One person specifically asked Faison "have you met with Governor Perdue regarding this (chair) position? If so, has she expressed her opinion about your candidacy?"
Faison's answer was incredibly unclear. Here's his response, verbatim:
"I have spoken with Governor Perdue, Commissioner Goodwin, Education Secretary Atkinson, Minority Leader Elect Senator Nesbitt, Minority Leader Elect Representative Hackney, numerous Senators and Representatives, Former Governor Hunt, and SEC members across this State. They all want the same thing. They want Democrats to win. They want a Democratic agenda both legislatively and administratively. All of these elected officials know me and have worked with me in the Legislature. They all believe that I can do the better job leading the party and helping all democrats across our State win election."
- Bill Faison
Is it just me or is Faison purposely sidestepping the question by being vague? I don't see a straight answer from him as to whether Perdue is or is not endorsing Faison. Instead he uses an unverifiable yet suggestive phrase claiming to know what Perdue and other elected officials "believe"-- that he's the guy to do a better job leading the party.
Well, who couldn't do a better job in comparison to the current state party chair David Young's performance? In case you haven't heard by now, two years ago the outgoing NCDP chair Jerry Meek worked like a rabid dog to find someone to run against David Parker who was the front runner for the state party chair seat. Meek then blackmailed the gubernatorial candidate Perdue into backing David Young over David Parker. It worked. And then things didn't work.
Perdue sided with Young to appease Meek during a tough election while Meek was still chair. Then the state party began its sad descent into handing over most elections to republican candidates over the next two years. Sadly, David Young has done a poor job which contributed directly to our democratic candidates take a major "shellacking" across the state. Now, Jerry Meek wants Bill Faison to chair the state democratic party.
By now you've got to ask yourself can we really afford to have another Meek-pick in the most important job of the North Carolina Democratic Party? Yeah, I don't think so either.
Meek's reasons for backing Bill Faison have nothing to do with Faison and everything to do with scrambling again to find a challenger to David Parker who announced his chair candidacy first on the heels of Young's announcement he would not be seeking a second term. It's widely known Meek has a chip on his shoulder where Parker is concerned.
It's also widely known Bill Faison's district is likely to disappear once the Republican majority gets through redistricting this year and consolidating democratic districts to further reduce the democrats votes in the House. Faison's political career is certifiably vulnerable and Meek knows it which is why he chose Faison, like the sacrificial lamb slated for slaughter.
But folks, don't take my word for it. Just look around. Our state and our nation are in dire straits with the Republican takeover after the disastrous mid-term elections which can only blame a small part on the Tea-Party tidal wave of momentum. A big part of our losses here in NC were due to a weak effort to get democrats to the polls and an even more feeble result in raising funds to support those democratic candidates.
We can not afford to sit back and hope for the best. It's time to pay attention and think this through and make up your own mind, instead of running with the herd of sheep led by Meek promising progressives whatever it takes to keep their confidence. For what it's worth, Meek never did make good getting the Progressive Democrats that elusive auxiliary status inside the party.
Now, do you really think a sitting legislator like Bill Faison is going to have the time to run his law firm, fulfill his duties as a legislator, meet with his constituents while running the state party (a 60-hour work week, minimum) and regularly visit the 100 counties in order to raise the much needed party funds rather than for his own re-election campaign? And what happens when the legislature is in session? Who'll run the party and making the trips needed to glad-hand donors, meet activists and solicit funds from PACs? Faison says don't worry, he's a high-energy guy. Yeah, right. He's 63. And there are only so many hours in the day. Most of his are already filled.
Meek's mission is simple. Based on his own personal issues, he is working hard to rob the North Carolina Democratic Party of the solid, proven leadership of David Parker who's a full decade younger than Faison and far more experienced in party-building and party leadership. And Parker knows how to win elections, too, both as a campaign manager and as an elected official (2002-2006). Check out his bio. As for endorsements, a clear majority of the 13 congressional district chairs are solidly backing Parker and are listed along with SEC members and officials on Parker's endorsement page on his website, www.voteparker.com for some time now.
Meanwhile, the Faison website's endorsement page is completely blank and still unmarred by a single name.
Well, who couldn't do a better job in comparison to the current state party chair David Young's performance? In case you haven't heard by now, two years ago the outgoing NCDP chair Jerry Meek worked like a rabid dog to find someone to run against David Parker who was the front runner for the state party chair seat. Meek then blackmailed the gubernatorial candidate Perdue into backing David Young over David Parker. It worked. And then things didn't work.
Perdue sided with Young to appease Meek during a tough election while Meek was still chair. Then the state party began its sad descent into handing over most elections to republican candidates over the next two years. Sadly, David Young has done a poor job which contributed directly to our democratic candidates take a major "shellacking" across the state. Now, Jerry Meek wants Bill Faison to chair the state democratic party.
By now you've got to ask yourself can we really afford to have another Meek-pick in the most important job of the North Carolina Democratic Party? Yeah, I don't think so either.
Meek's reasons for backing Bill Faison have nothing to do with Faison and everything to do with scrambling again to find a challenger to David Parker who announced his chair candidacy first on the heels of Young's announcement he would not be seeking a second term. It's widely known Meek has a chip on his shoulder where Parker is concerned.
It's also widely known Bill Faison's district is likely to disappear once the Republican majority gets through redistricting this year and consolidating democratic districts to further reduce the democrats votes in the House. Faison's political career is certifiably vulnerable and Meek knows it which is why he chose Faison, like the sacrificial lamb slated for slaughter.
But folks, don't take my word for it. Just look around. Our state and our nation are in dire straits with the Republican takeover after the disastrous mid-term elections which can only blame a small part on the Tea-Party tidal wave of momentum. A big part of our losses here in NC were due to a weak effort to get democrats to the polls and an even more feeble result in raising funds to support those democratic candidates.
We can not afford to sit back and hope for the best. It's time to pay attention and think this through and make up your own mind, instead of running with the herd of sheep led by Meek promising progressives whatever it takes to keep their confidence. For what it's worth, Meek never did make good getting the Progressive Democrats that elusive auxiliary status inside the party.
Now, do you really think a sitting legislator like Bill Faison is going to have the time to run his law firm, fulfill his duties as a legislator, meet with his constituents while running the state party (a 60-hour work week, minimum) and regularly visit the 100 counties in order to raise the much needed party funds rather than for his own re-election campaign? And what happens when the legislature is in session? Who'll run the party and making the trips needed to glad-hand donors, meet activists and solicit funds from PACs? Faison says don't worry, he's a high-energy guy. Yeah, right. He's 63. And there are only so many hours in the day. Most of his are already filled.
Meek's mission is simple. Based on his own personal issues, he is working hard to rob the North Carolina Democratic Party of the solid, proven leadership of David Parker who's a full decade younger than Faison and far more experienced in party-building and party leadership. And Parker knows how to win elections, too, both as a campaign manager and as an elected official (2002-2006). Check out his bio. As for endorsements, a clear majority of the 13 congressional district chairs are solidly backing Parker and are listed along with SEC members and officials on Parker's endorsement page on his website, www.voteparker.com for some time now.
Meanwhile, the Faison website's endorsement page is completely blank and still unmarred by a single name.
. ..........
bill faison,
David Parker,
First Vice-Chair,
Governor Bev Perdue,
Jerry Meek,
NCDP
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Timing is Everything!
Being "in the right place at the right time" is the key to success. But getting that opportunity is pure luck.
So is the case of Jerry Meek, former chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party. Lucky to be in the right place at the right time, Meek benefitted immensely from the 2008 Barack Obama presidential campaign's aggressive grassroots efforts to turn North Carolina blue for the first time in 34 years. However, progressive democrat and elected official, Dan Besse, took this NCDP Insider to task on BlueNC's website yesterday for poking holes in the Meek Myth.
"All I can tell from his/her blog is that he/she detests Jerry Meek and blames him for everything wrong with the NCDP. Which, if nothing else, certainly overstates Jerry's degree of influence," said Besse. "And, of course, it doesn't provide much in the way of coherent narrative--since two years ago while Jerry was chair a Democratic presidential candidate won NC for the first time since 1976. Personally, I don't credit our chair party at any given time with magical powers for either good or evil, but let's be consistent."
Okay. If you grant Meek credit for turning the state blue, then you have to grant Meek credit for the state party's failures, too. Were it not for the Obama campaign opening 52 field offices throughout NC in 2008, a presidential election year where turnout is expected to be higher, NC would have remained a political "red state."
The fact is of the 4.3 million votes cast in NC, a mere 14,177 more people voted for the democratic presidential candidate over the republican one. That's less than a third-of-one-percent (.003 %). Those 52 field offices diligently registered new voters and it paid off. North Carolina had the highest increase in voter turnout in the country, growing from 57% to 65%. For that the Obama campaign deserves full credit, not Jerry Meek as some might want to believe.
"Those who have succeeded at anything and don't mention luck are kidding themselves." - Larry King
"Anyone who pretends that some kind of luck isn't involved in his success is deluding himself." - Arthur Hailey
So is the case of Jerry Meek, former chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party. Lucky to be in the right place at the right time, Meek benefitted immensely from the 2008 Barack Obama presidential campaign's aggressive grassroots efforts to turn North Carolina blue for the first time in 34 years. However, progressive democrat and elected official, Dan Besse, took this NCDP Insider to task on BlueNC's website yesterday for poking holes in the Meek Myth.
"All I can tell from his/her blog is that he/she detests Jerry Meek and blames him for everything wrong with the NCDP. Which, if nothing else, certainly overstates Jerry's degree of influence," said Besse. "And, of course, it doesn't provide much in the way of coherent narrative--since two years ago while Jerry was chair a Democratic presidential candidate won NC for the first time since 1976. Personally, I don't credit our chair party at any given time with magical powers for either good or evil, but let's be consistent."
Okay. If you grant Meek credit for turning the state blue, then you have to grant Meek credit for the state party's failures, too. Were it not for the Obama campaign opening 52 field offices throughout NC in 2008, a presidential election year where turnout is expected to be higher, NC would have remained a political "red state."
The fact is of the 4.3 million votes cast in NC, a mere 14,177 more people voted for the democratic presidential candidate over the republican one. That's less than a third-of-one-percent (.003 %). Those 52 field offices diligently registered new voters and it paid off. North Carolina had the highest increase in voter turnout in the country, growing from 57% to 65%. For that the Obama campaign deserves full credit, not Jerry Meek as some might want to believe.
"The essential ingredient of politics is timing." - Pierre Trudeau, former Canadian Prime MinisterMany a great idea that failed initially was labeled as ahead of its time, a polite way of saying "bad timing." Conversely, when things work out well, it's because the timing was right. And that brings us to Meek who had the good fortune to chair the democratic party at the right time -- during a historic presidential election year with unprecedented turnout and democratic-momentum. That's not to say that Meek didn't contribute to the state democratic party's success in some ways.
Most democratic candidates who won their 2008 races did so on the coat-tails of the Obama candidacy's excitement and enormous democratic voter turnout. Even Meek admits he didn't do anything phenomenal. "I don't know that we did anything different than in other states, but the magnitude was so different," said Meek. "We were the only state in the country with a nationally targeted presidential race, gubernatorial race and Senate race." And that fact brings us to back to why the Obama campaign opened those 52 field offices in North Carolina. They weren't counting on the state party to get the job done.
So where did Meek screw up? Consider his bullying the 2008 gubernatorial democratic candidate into supporting Meek's personal choice for state party chair, David Young, in an overt effort (and some say personal vendetta) to block contender David Parker. By hand-picking an ineffective successor, Meek is fully responsible for setting up the party's candidates to fail in subsequent elections. Today, Wake County, the state's largest county, has new republican majorities on both its school board and county commission after democratic candidates got slaughtered at the polls.
Then there's the money excuse. Republicans raised way more money than Democrats since 2008 and out-advertised them as well. But that's not the real reason democrats lost recent elections. The NC Democratic Party slipped into cruise-control after the presidential election, smugly expecting the newly registered voters to just show up at all future elections.
That didn't happen. By letting voter engagement dissipate, the party had to reactivate the base, and that didn't happen either. As a result, Democrats lost ground and control of the state legislature to Republicans for the first time in over 100 years.
So where did Meek screw up? Consider his bullying the 2008 gubernatorial democratic candidate into supporting Meek's personal choice for state party chair, David Young, in an overt effort (and some say personal vendetta) to block contender David Parker. By hand-picking an ineffective successor, Meek is fully responsible for setting up the party's candidates to fail in subsequent elections. Today, Wake County, the state's largest county, has new republican majorities on both its school board and county commission after democratic candidates got slaughtered at the polls.
Then there's the money excuse. Republicans raised way more money than Democrats since 2008 and out-advertised them as well. But that's not the real reason democrats lost recent elections. The NC Democratic Party slipped into cruise-control after the presidential election, smugly expecting the newly registered voters to just show up at all future elections.
That didn't happen. By letting voter engagement dissipate, the party had to reactivate the base, and that didn't happen either. As a result, Democrats lost ground and control of the state legislature to Republicans for the first time in over 100 years.
Then there's the state party's 2010 US Senate primary debacle. Covertly, Meek coalesced the progressives democratic base to support the untested, "camera-ready" candidate Cal Cunningham to challenge an older, female, established and proven candidate, Elaine Marshall (the NC Secretary of State) for Republican Senator Richard Burr's seat.
Republicans gleefully watched as egotistical democratic party leaders, here and in Washington DC, tried to force Cunningham on voters and ended up imploding the democratic candidates' war chests. Slyly, Meek eventually endorsed Marshall publicly after polls showed Cunningham's numbers dropping weeks before the primary run-off. Like a rat escaping a sinking ship.
For those who insist on wearing rose-colored glasses, it can be hard to see the facts clearly. Still, nothing is as obnoxious as taking credit for others' work and results, nor as transparent as the denial of pure dumb luck.
Republicans gleefully watched as egotistical democratic party leaders, here and in Washington DC, tried to force Cunningham on voters and ended up imploding the democratic candidates' war chests. Slyly, Meek eventually endorsed Marshall publicly after polls showed Cunningham's numbers dropping weeks before the primary run-off. Like a rat escaping a sinking ship.
For those who insist on wearing rose-colored glasses, it can be hard to see the facts clearly. Still, nothing is as obnoxious as taking credit for others' work and results, nor as transparent as the denial of pure dumb luck.
. ..........
David Parker,
David Young,
First Vice-Chair,
Jerry Meek,
money,
NCDP,
North Carolina Democratic Party,
screw up,
timing
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Dannie Montgomery running for NCDP Chair
Correction: This post was updated to correct an inaccuracy concerning Montgomery's 2009 bid for Chair, not first vice chair as previously mentioned.
Dannie Montgomery has joined the race seeking to become the next Chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party. You may remember Dannie Montgomery. She was the First Vice Chair of the state party for six years, four of those alongside former party chair Jerry Meek but that ended in 2009.
Montgomery and Meek had a falling-out at some point and tension was clear between them when Meek's would neither back nor endorse Montgomery in her 2009 bid for chair. Instead, Meek backed David Young. We haven't heard much from Montgomery since then but that changed yesterday when Montgomery emailed her campaign announcement to hundreds of "executive (party) members" seeking their support and votes.
Montgomery's pitch did point out the failures of the mid-term elections as belonging to the current state party administration. "We have a problem. You and I are the solution. The NC General Assembly is in Republican hands after a century of Democratic leadership and the attacks have already begun. This takes place at a time when we have a Democratic Governor and a Democratic President leading our state and country. Now is the time to address the challenges of the 2010 elections with new leadership, vision, skill, and renewed determination to place NC government back in the hands of the people who have a proven record of success for the people of North Carolina."
Unfortunately, Montgomery's candidacy could cause more harm than good. By running as a late-entry and third option, she could be an election spoiler and hand her "frenemy" and nemesis Meek's candidate a narrow victory. Then again, the backlash against Meek is palpable inside the party. People are fed up with his egotism that he actually controls the party.
Still, politically savvy insiders know Montgomery has plopped herself into a strategic and favorable position. By entering the race now, Montgomery knows that should she come in third place (and she will), she is perfectly poised to be courted, caucused and a**-kissed by her fellow chair candidates for her endorsement before the next voting round. If Montgomery's as smart as we think she is, she'll plan to drop out early and throw her support (and her supporters' votes) to David Parker, the stronger leader of the two candidates.
And wouldn't that be a cold, hard slap in the face to Meek?
Montgomery should consider dropping out of the chair race and instead run for her old job against Stella Adams who's record of success is anemic at best. Better yet, Montgomery might want to challenge second vice chair Delmas Parker for his seat. Either way, Danny Montgomery is going to impact this party election one way or another.
Lets hope it's for the better.
Dannie Montgomery has joined the race seeking to become the next Chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party. You may remember Dannie Montgomery. She was the First Vice Chair of the state party for six years, four of those alongside former party chair Jerry Meek but that ended in 2009.
Montgomery and Meek had a falling-out at some point and tension was clear between them when Meek's would neither back nor endorse Montgomery in her 2009 bid for chair. Instead, Meek backed David Young. We haven't heard much from Montgomery since then but that changed yesterday when Montgomery emailed her campaign announcement to hundreds of "executive (party) members" seeking their support and votes.
"I am passiionate (sic) about the Democratic Party and your support in my campaign will be priceless to the state of North Carolina. My greatest strength lie in my blending of leadership styles that incorporate what are seen as traditionally male and female traits: vigor, hard work, kindness, rigorous discipline, integrity, creativity, inspiration, and much more." Montgomery adds, "I am available for a meeting, forum, or conversation at your convenience and look forward to discussing the future of the North Carolina Demoratic Party and your endorsement. We took a "shulacking" in the 2010 election and 2012 will not be a repeat performance."The Anson County democrat and teacher listed her numerous positions served in various democratic party ranks (county chair, 1999-2005, 8th congressional district chair in 2004, lost a run-off election for county commissioner, Larry Kissell campaign team member, etc.) and her awards (3x teacher of the year at her school). No real specifics on how she'll engage or activate the party's base.
- Dannie Montgomery
Montgomery's pitch did point out the failures of the mid-term elections as belonging to the current state party administration. "We have a problem. You and I are the solution. The NC General Assembly is in Republican hands after a century of Democratic leadership and the attacks have already begun. This takes place at a time when we have a Democratic Governor and a Democratic President leading our state and country. Now is the time to address the challenges of the 2010 elections with new leadership, vision, skill, and renewed determination to place NC government back in the hands of the people who have a proven record of success for the people of North Carolina."
Unfortunately, Montgomery's candidacy could cause more harm than good. By running as a late-entry and third option, she could be an election spoiler and hand her "frenemy" and nemesis Meek's candidate a narrow victory. Then again, the backlash against Meek is palpable inside the party. People are fed up with his egotism that he actually controls the party.
Still, politically savvy insiders know Montgomery has plopped herself into a strategic and favorable position. By entering the race now, Montgomery knows that should she come in third place (and she will), she is perfectly poised to be courted, caucused and a**-kissed by her fellow chair candidates for her endorsement before the next voting round. If Montgomery's as smart as we think she is, she'll plan to drop out early and throw her support (and her supporters' votes) to David Parker, the stronger leader of the two candidates.
And wouldn't that be a cold, hard slap in the face to Meek?
Montgomery should consider dropping out of the chair race and instead run for her old job against Stella Adams who's record of success is anemic at best. Better yet, Montgomery might want to challenge second vice chair Delmas Parker for his seat. Either way, Danny Montgomery is going to impact this party election one way or another.
Lets hope it's for the better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)